Part I
Theoretical Foundations

2. Constitutionalism(s)  

by Robert Schütze

Important Cases

Download Attachments

  • Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803), 177
    DECEMBER, i8ox. it iball have been paid to the creditor. The flieriff may TuRNIM certainly make fuch payment out of court, if no circumI. ftance occuirs which legally obitructs or oppofes it, fuch FENDALL. as an injunction from the court of chancery, in which cafe, fby the law of Virginia, the money muft b6 returned…Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803), 177
  • Minerva Mills Ltd. And Others v. Union of India and Others, AIR 1980 SC 1789
    http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA PETITIONER: MINERVA MILLS LTD. & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT31/07/1980 BENCH: CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ) BENCH: CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. ((CJ) BHAGWATI, P.N. GUPTA, A.C. UNTWALIA, N.L. KAILASAM, P.S. CITATION: 1980 AIR 1789 1980 SCC (3) 625 CITATOR INFO : E&R 1981 SC 271 MV 1982 SC1325…Minerva Mills Ltd. And Others v. Union of India and Others, AIR 1980 SC 1789
  • Case 6/ 64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585
    COSTA that seeing imposed been Treaty States and but in Commission Community 177, the law 9. Article as by tionals does not more duty its State Member States than rules nationals of those the country governing the undertakings. part 10. Article 37 (2) constitutes in EEC the of its all Article 102 contains EEC the…Case 6/ 64 Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 585